Back to Learning Center

Blog

Specialty tag(s): Collaborative Divorce, Austin Collaborative Divorce

How the Collaborative Divorce Process Works Under Texas Law

Kristen A. Algert | February 2, 2026

Collaborative Divorce in Texas is a private, client-led settlement process where spouses sign an agreement to resolve divorce issues outside court.

Most families don’t belong in a courtroom. Courts are built for disputes that can’t be resolved any other way – not for parents who need a workable custody schedule or couples dividing a business they built together.

Collaborative Divorce offers a different path: a structured, private dispute resolution process where you and your spouse make decisions, supported by attorneys and neutral experts, rather than handing control to a judge with limited time and limited information about your family.

It’s not for every situation – it requires good-faith participation and honest financial disclosure from both sides. But when those conditions exist, Collaborative Divorce consistently produces more durable agreements, lower conflict, and better outcomes for children and families.

This guide explains how the process works under Texas law, who’s involved, and how to know whether it’s right for your situation.

What Collaborative Divorce Actually Is

Collaborative Divorce is a structured way to settle a divorce outside the courtroom. Each spouse has their own collaboratively trained lawyer, everyone signs a participation agreement, and the case is negotiated through a series of private meetings rather than motions and hearings.

Under Chapter 15 of the Texas Family Code – the collaborative family law statute – a case is treated as a Collaborative Divorce when both spouses sign a collaborative family law participation agreement and are each represented by collaborative lawyers. The same statute also sets rules for pausing most court activity while the process is underway and for keeping collaborative communications confidential and privileged.

While the collaborative process is active, the focus stays on reaching agreements instead of preparing for court dates, filing contested motions, or asking a judge to make interim decisions.

Collaborative Divorce is also based on productive and beneficial outcomes. Instead of arguing over fixed positions like “I want the house,” the work revolves around the needs underneath them, like financial security, keeping children in their school district, protecting a business, or creating a parenting plan that is realistic for day-to-day life. This often makes it easier to explore options without treating every issue as a win-lose fight.

In practice, three hallmarks of the process are:

• A signed participation agreement that sets the rules of the process, including that the collaborative lawyers must withdraw if either party decides they want to go to Court.
• An interdisciplinary team structure, where neutral professionals are jointly engaged when helpful.
• A shared commitment to timely, full, candid disclosure of all relevant information so decisions are made from the same set of facts.

A collaborative approach means you are both willing to work within a structured framework toward resolution rather than handing decisions to a court. A useful way to think about it is: litigation tends to happen in the “shadow of the law” (what a judge might order), while collaboration happens in the “shadow of the future” (what agreement will actually work for your family in five or ten years). In other words, litigation focuses on what a judge might order, while Collaborative Divorce focuses on what will actually work for your family long-term.

Remember: The process does not require you to like each other. It requires a willingness to keep negotiating in good faith, even through strong emotions and real conflict, because the structure is designed to help you reach workable outcomes.

The Participation Agreement: what you’re signing up for

The participation agreement is what makes a Collaborative Divorce legally binding under Texas law. Both spouses – and their attorneys and any jointly engaged neutral professionals – sign a written contract committing to resolve the case outside the courtroom. Texas Family Code Section 15.101 requires this agreement, and the collaborative process officially begins when both parties sign.

The agreement establishes three things:

The rules of engagement. You’re committing to transparency, good-faith negotiation, and working toward resolution rather than preparing for trial.

A pause in court proceedings. While collaboration is active, the court doesn’t set hearings, discovery deadlines, or trial dates. The focus stays on reaching an agreement.

Shared accountability through disqualification. If the process ends without resolution and the case moves to litigation, both collaborative attorneys must withdraw. Neither can represent you in court.

That last point is intentional. Knowing that going to court means hiring new lawyers keeps everyone invested in making the process work. It shifts the dynamic from positional bargaining to genuine problem-solving – and it’s a key reason collaborative divorce has such high settlement rates.

How the Process Works, Step by Step

1) Initial Consultation and Screening

A collaborative case usually starts with a private consultation with a collaboratively trained attorney. Under Texas law, the lawyer must help you assess whether the collaborative process is appropriate for your situation and give you enough information to make an informed decision compared with other options like litigation or mediation.

Texas law expects collaborative attorneys to make a reasonable inquiry about family violence and other safety concerns before a prospective party signs a participation agreement, because those issues can change what is realistic and appropriate.

2) Building the Team

Once both spouses have collaborative counsel, a team may be assembled based on what your case actually needs. Many collaborative divorces use neutral professionals, often a neutral financial professional and a neutral mental health professional. 

3) Signing the Participation Agreement

The collaborative process officially begins when you both sign a collaborative family law participation agreement.

That agreement sets the ground rules, identifies each spouse’s collaborative lawyer and the other neutral professionals, and confirms the intent to resolve the matter through the collaborative process under Chapter 15.

4) Identifying Goals and Issues

In order to problem-solve productively, everyone has to know both of your Interests and Goals – what is important to you. In addition, the lawyers need to identify the potential issues in your case that may be related to the children or to the financial estate.

5) Information Gathering 

Instead of formal discovery, the process relies on timely, full, candid, and informal disclosure of all relevant information related to the matter, even if the relevant information is not specifically requested.  Updates are essential when material changes occur.

6) Option Development

The professionals and the clients work through priorities and constraints and develop options for resolving the issues in the case, keeping an eye on what you and your spouse said were important Interests and Goals. Raising an option is not the same as agreeing to it, which makes it easier to explore creative solutions without locking anyone into a position too early.

7) Option Evaluation

After several options for resolution of issues have been developed, everyone evaluates those options based on the Interests and Goals of you and your spouse.  The options that meet those important Interests and Goals are kept on the table; the other options are eliminated. 

8) Negotiation and Resolution

Options are tested against budgets, parenting realities, and long-term feasibility. The financial neutral can help model tradeoffs, stress-test proposals, and keep conversations anchored in the same set of numbers. 

9) Drafting and Finalizing

When you reach an agreement, the lawyers may draft a Collaborative Law Settlement Agreement memorializing the terms that everyone signs.  This settlement agreement is then turned into an Agreed Final Decree of Divorce that everyone reviews and signs. This process can take a few weeks, but it does not generally require additional joint meetings. 

10) The Prove-Up (Final Court Step Where Decree is Submitted to the Judge to Sign)

Even in a Collaborative Divorce, you typically still finalize the divorce through a short, uncontested prove-up hearing where the judge signs the decree.

The pace is largely set by the parties rather than a court calendar. That flexibility can be a real advantage if you need to schedule around work, childcare, or busy seasons, but it can also become a drawback if one spouse is not ready to engage consistently.

Who’s on Your Team Besides Your Attorney?

Collaborative Divorce often uses an interdisciplinary team model, meaning decisions are supported by professionals who focus on finances, communication, and children, rather than requiring lawyers to handle everything. Each role is different, and understanding who does what helps set realistic expectations from the start.

Your Collaborative Attorney

You still have your own lawyer, and that lawyer still owes you full fiduciary duties. A collaborative attorney’s role is to advise you on your rights and obligations, identify legal issues in your case, explain legal options and risks, help you evaluate proposals, and draft the documents needed to make your agreement enforceable. Instead of preparing for courtroom battles, your lawyer focuses on guiding negotiations, problem-solving, and helping you reach a durable resolution that fits your circumstances.

The Financial Neutral

In many Collaborative Divorces, the team includes a single neutral financial professional. This person may be a CPA, Certified Divorce Financial Analyst (CDFA), or Certified Financial Planner (CFP), depending on the complexity of the finances. The main point to highlight here is neutrality. The financial neutral works for both spouses, not as an advocate for either side.

Their role typically includes gathering and organizing financial information, preparing budgets and cash-flow analyses, identifying assets that may need to be valued, and modeling settlement options so everyone is working from the same numbers. Using one shared expert avoids the “dueling experts” problem common in litigation, where each spouse hires their own accountant, and you pay twice for conflicting opinions. It also avoids the lawyers doing the work at a higher hourly rate and cost to the clients.

What does financial neutral actually do?
We’ve established that they are a shared, neutral financial professional hired to help both spouses make decisions from the same set of facts. They:

Build the financial picture:
Collects and organizes documents, identifies assets, debts, income/expenditures, and household and child-related budgets so everyone is working from the same numbers. 

Identifies property issues: Helps track separate and community property using records, preventing confusion and reducing disputes, or at a minimum identifying that a “tracing” may be needed. May also identify assets in need of valuations.

Model “what if” outcomes: Runs scenarios so you can see how different settlements affect cash flow, taxes, and long-term stability (including retirement).

Support informed decisions: Helps both spouses understand post-divorce financial realities, especially if one person handled most of the money during the marriage. May also provide education and identify potential tax issues.

The Mental Health Professional, Process Facilitator, or Communication Coach

This professional is not acting as a therapist and does not provide individual or marital counseling. Their role is process-focused. They help structure and facilitate productive conversations, manage emotionally charged meetings, and work with parents on the legally-required parenting plan.  Their overarching goal is to support productive communication so negotiations do not stall or escalate unnecessarily. For some couples, this support makes it possible to have discussions that would otherwise break down under stress. 

The Child Specialist (When Needed)

In cases involving children, the team may include a child specialist after consulting with the parents. This neutral professional meets with the children and brings their perspective to the parents and team in an age-appropriate way. The goal is not to ask children to choose sides or make decisions, but to make sure their experiences and needs are considered without placing them in the middle of parental conflict.

Together, this team structure allows each expert professional to work in their area of expertise, often making the process more efficient and better aligned with real family needs.

What Full Disclosure Really Means

In Collaborative Divorce, “full disclosure” is a legal standard written into Texas law. Section 15.109 requires “timely, full, candid, and informal disclosure” of information related to the collaborative matter, without formal discovery, and it requires prompt updates when something materially changes. This usually means:

• You share information early and voluntarily, so decisions are made on the same set of facts, not suspicions.
• You update what you’ve shared if there’s a meaningful change during the process (income shift, new job offer, asset value change, major expense).
• You do this without subpoenas, interrogatories, or depositions. The Collaborative process relies on transparency rather than the court’s discovery tools.

Something worth mentioning is that the statute ties the disclosure duty to “on the request of another party,” and it also allows the parties to define the scope of disclosure during the process. In practice, most collaborative teams treat disclosure as broader than “only what was asked for” because the whole process depends on both spouses trusting the information they’re using to make decisions.

This is both a strength and a limitation of Collaborative Divorce. Good faith, full disclosure is what makes it possible to reach a settlement without adversarial discovery. It can also make the collaborative approach a poor fit if you have evidence that your spouse is incapable of telling the truth, is hiding assets, does not always follow the law, or will not be transparent, because you may need the subpoena power and the threat of court that comes with litigation.

Remember: If material information is intentionally withheld, the process can break down quickly, and lawyers may need to withdraw under their professional obligations, which can end the collaborative process. 

What Happens if the Process Falls Apart?

The collaborative process can terminate in a few ways. Either spouse can end it by giving written notice. It also ends if a party seeks court intervention without everyone’s agreement, or if the team reaches an impasse that cannot be resolved within the collaborative framework or with the assistance of a mediator. In some situations, safety concerns or a breakdown in trust make continuing unrealistic, and ending the process is the responsible choice.

The most significant consequence is disqualification. Under Texas law, when the Collaborative process ends, and the case moves to litigation, both collaborative attorneys must withdraw from representing the spouses in court. This happens automatically under the participation agreement and Section 15.106 of the Texas Family Code. You do not get to “switch gears” and keep the same lawyer.

There is often a short transition period after termination. Temporary arrangements usually stay in place while both spouses retain litigation counsel, but the Collaborative process itself has ended.

Not everything is lost. Objective materials typically remain usable, including financial documents, possibly asset valuations, budgets, and written reports or spreadsheets prepared by the neutral professionals on your team. What does not carry over are the privileged Collaborative communications from Collaborative Joint Meetings (protected by the statute in Section 15.114), the negotiation history, and the institutional knowledge your attorney developed about your priorities and strategy.

Termination does not always mean failure. If one spouse is not negotiating in good faith or is withholding information, ending the collaborative process is often the right call. A responsible Collaborative attorney will recommend that path when the process no longer protects you. The cost of retaining new lawyers is real, though, and it’s a risk you should discuss with your lawyer to understand before you begin.

When Collaborative Divorce isn’t the Right fit

Collaborative Divorce works well in many situations, but not all. It’s important to recognize when a different approach better protects you. A good Collaborative lawyer can help you assess the likelihood of success in the Collaborative process so you can make a fully-informed choice. 

Domestic violence or coercive control. The process assumes both spouses can speak freely and negotiate without fear. If that’s not possible, even with the assistance of your Collaborative Lawyer, then a Collaborative Divorce may cause harm rather than prevent it.  You do not want to continue a harmful marital dynamic in the Collaborative process.

Suspected hidden assets. Collaborative relies on voluntary disclosure. If you believe your spouse is concealing income or assets, and that the professionals in your Collaborative case will not be able to discern that, litigation’s subpoena power and sworn discovery may be necessary.

Bad-faith participation. The process only works when both spouses genuinely want a resolution. If one party is stalling, does not want to get divorced, will not produce factual information, or avoids accountability, collaboration can become costly and unproductive.

Urgent need for court protection. If you need emergency orders to protect yourself, your children, or your assets, litigation is the appropriate path.

A trained Collaborative attorney will tell you early on if another process fits your situation better.

Is this the Right Approach for Your Situation?

Collaborative Divorce works best when both spouses can commit to three things: transparency, sustained engagement through difficult conversations, and a focus on workable outcomes rather than winning individual points.

You don’t need to be friendly. You don’t need to agree on everything. You need to be willing to stay at the table and work toward resolution.

It’s often a strong fit if you:

• Value privacy
• Are committed to co-parenting and want to minimize the divorce’s impact on the children
• Desire to control the outcome of your case
• Have complex finances that benefit from shared neutral experts rather than dueling advocates
• Are willing to consider your spouse’s Interests and Goals and to negotiate in good faith, even when it’s hard

For families who meet these conditions, collaborative divorce offers a more efficient, possibly faster, less adversarial, and more durable path forward than litigation – one where the agreements you reach reflect your priorities, not a judge’s limited snapshot of your family.

Want to learn more about this? Take a read of these: 
Why Does Collaborative Divorce Work Better for Couples?
Benefits of Collaborative Divorce: How Can it Foster Effective Communication?

Ultimately, the real question is this: are you both willing to stay at the table through difficult conversations, knowing that walking away usually means starting over with new lawyers and high additional costs?

How Goranson Bain Ausley Approaches Collaborative Divorce

Goranson Bain Ausley has more Collaborative Divorce specialists than any firm in the country. More than half of our 57 attorneys are trained in the collaborative process, and four partners hold advanced credentials through Collaborative Divorce Texas – a level of depth and commitment that shapes how we guide families through it.

That experience also means we know when Collaborative Divorce isn’t the right path. We don’t treat it as a default or a philosophy. It’s one option alongside litigation, mediation, and arbitration, and the right choice depends on your circumstances: the complexity of your finances, your co-parenting goals, whether both spouses can engage honestly, and what kind of resolution will actually hold up over time.

When Collaborative Divorce fits, it offers something genuinely valuable – a private, structured process where you retain control over decisions that will shape your family’s future. Our role is to help you evaluate whether that’s the right path, and if it is, to guide you through it with the strategic depth and support the process requires.

With offices in Austin, Dallas, Fort Worth, Granbury, Midland, Plano, and San Antonio, we support families across Texas. Get in touch to schedule a consultation.

Sign Up For Our Blog.